From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardaway v. Leichnitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Sep 2, 2011
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-1956 (JCH) (D. Conn. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-1956 (JCH)

09-02-2011

LENA HARDAWAY, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LEICHNITZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [Doc. No. 5]

Pending before the court is plaintiff Lena Hardaway's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 5). In her Motions, Hardaway requests that the court restrain the defendants from further operation of a "fraudulent Connecticut Body Magic website." Id. at 1. Based on the Complaint, the court understands this website to be: http://www.ConnecticutBodyMagic.com. Compl., at 3. Hardaway operates a website with a similar name, http://www.CTBodyMagic.com. Compl., at 2. Hardaway also operates a store in Enfield, Connecticut under the name Connecticut Body Magic, and Hardaway claims that she has registered this business name with the State of Connecticut. Compl., at 3.

The Complaint also discusses the operation of two other websites by the defendants, http://www.bodymagicweightlosssystem.com/connecticut_body_magic, and http://www.Ardysslife.com/BodyMagicCT. Compl., at 6-7. The precise URLs cited in the Complaint do not appear to link to live websites. Moreover, the more general domain name "bodymagicweightlosssytem.com" links to a website entitled "Body Magic by Ardyss," and therefore does not appear to be the "fraudulent Connecticut Body Magic" website referenced in Hardaway's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

Although Hardaway claims that she has registered the name "CT Body Magic" with the State of Connecticut, no such registration appears to exist in the official directory of the Connecticut Secretary of State. See Sec'y of State of CT, Commercial Recording Div., http://www.concord-sots.ct.gov/CONCORD/index.jsp (last visited Sept. 1, 2011) (click "Search Database/Business" to perform keyword search).
--------

In reviewing the Motion, the court discovered that the allegedly offending website is no longer in operation, and an unrelated placeholder site has been posted by a domain registrar. The court takes judicial notice that the relief requested by Hardaway is no longer required. Cf. U.S. v. Akinrosotu, 637 F.3d 165 (2d Cir. 2011) (taking judicial notice of information on the Bureau of Prisons website); Ligon v. Doherty, 208 F.Supp.2d 384, 386 (E.D.N.Y. 2002) (taking judicial notice of records on the New York Department of Correctional Services website). As a consequence, Hardaway's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. No. 5] is terminated as moot without prejudice to renew.

SO ORDERED

Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 2nd day of September, 2011.

Janet C. Hall

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hardaway v. Leichnitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Sep 2, 2011
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-1956 (JCH) (D. Conn. Sep. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Hardaway v. Leichnitz

Case Details

Full title:LENA HARDAWAY, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LEICHNITZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-1956 (JCH) (D. Conn. Sep. 2, 2011)