From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harbour-Longmire Co. v. Owrey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 27, 1934
30 P.2d 155 (Okla. 1934)

Opinion

No. 22781

February 27, 1934.

(Syllabus.)

Master and Servant — Workmen's Compensation — Review of Awards — Remand of Cause in Accordance With Confession of Error.

In a proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, when the claimant, respondent, files a confession of error and the record and the authorities reasonably support said confession of error, this court may in its discretion remand the cause to the State Industrial Commission with instructions to vacate the award in accordance with said confession of error.

Original proceedings by the Harbour-Longmire Company and its insurance carrier to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made to Mary H. Owrey. Upon confession of error proceedings remanded to the State Industrial Commission, with directions to respondent the State Industrial Commission to vacate its order allowing the award.

Owen Looney, Paul N. Lindsey, and J. Fred Swanson, for petitioners.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., and Robt. D. Crowe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.


Petitioner herein filed this original proceeding August 31, 1931, to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made on the 10th day of August, 1931, finding that claimant Mary Owrey was in the employ of the petitioner Harbour-Longmire Company and while in said employ sustained an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of her employment.

On the 19th day of August, 1932, the Attorney General, for the respondents, filed a confession of error in which it is stated that after careful examination of the record, facts, and decision of the court with reference to the claim, they have come to the conclusion that there is no evidence that she was engaged in a hazardous occupation at the time of the injury.

This court has held that where an original proceeding is begun to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, and the petitioner files a confession of error, this court will examine the record, and if it reasonably tends to support said confession of error, will remand the cause to the Commission, with directions in accordance with the said confession of error. Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. Benefield, 164 Okla. 53, 22 P.2d 912.

This court has examined the record, and the authorities cited in support of the confession of error, and is of the opinion that the award should be remanded to the State Industrial Commission with directions to vacate the order in accordance with the confession of error. It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Harbour-Longmire Co. v. Owrey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 27, 1934
30 P.2d 155 (Okla. 1934)
Case details for

Harbour-Longmire Co. v. Owrey

Case Details

Full title:HARBOUR-LONGMIRE CO. et al. v. OWREY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 27, 1934

Citations

30 P.2d 155 (Okla. 1934)
167 Okla. 417

Citing Cases

Utley v. Phelan

"Respondents herein, having carefully searched the authorities to determine whether or not the State…

Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. McNeill

On March 28, 1939, respondent filed a confession of error in which it is admitted that the evidence in the…