From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansen v. Janitschek

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 22, 1960
158 A.2d 329 (N.J. 1960)

Summary

adopting dissenting opinion below

Summary of this case from Ervesun v. Bank of New York

Opinion

Argued February 9, 1960 —

Decided February 22, 1960.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Joseph C. Glavin argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Louis Auerbacher, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Samuel R. Blaine, on the brief).



The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in that court, and the matter is remanded to the trial judge who heard the case for reconsideration and a new determination.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 7.

For affirmance — None.


Summaries of

Hansen v. Janitschek

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 22, 1960
158 A.2d 329 (N.J. 1960)

adopting dissenting opinion below

Summary of this case from Ervesun v. Bank of New York
Case details for

Hansen v. Janitschek

Case Details

Full title:MINNIE HANSEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ADOLPH JANITSCHEK, INDIVIDUALLY…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 22, 1960

Citations

158 A.2d 329 (N.J. 1960)
158 A.2d 329

Citing Cases

Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.

Plaintiffs argue that the majority of state courts, including New Jersey, have held that fiduciary principles…

United Jersey Bank v. Wolosoff

Metalsalts Corp. v. Weiss, 76 N.J. Super. 291, 297 (Ch.Div. 1962). See also L.J. v. J.B., 150 N.J. Super.…