Opinion
A16A1409
08-08-2016
Hanh v. The State.
Jamie P. Hahn, for Appellant. Joseph Kenneth Mulholland, Moruf Olalere Oseni, for Appellee.
Jamie P. Hahn, for Appellant.
Joseph Kenneth Mulholland, Moruf Olalere Oseni, for Appellee.
Opinion
Phipps, Presiding Judge. Jamie P. Hanh appeals from the amended sentence entered after the trial court granted his motion to vacate void sentence. Hanh contends that the trial court erred in refusing to consider his motion to withdraw his guilty plea after finding his original sentence to be void. Because Hanh had a statutory right to withdraw his guilty plea, we reverse.
Although the pleadings and appellate brief indicate that Appellant's name is spelled “Hahn,” his name is spelled “Hanh” on the amended sentence. The records in his two prior appeals (A15A2339 and A15A2340, dismissed for failure to file a timely brief) are also inconsistent in this regard.
Hanh pled guilty to child molestation and was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment. Hanh subsequently filed a “Motion to Vacate Void Sentence,” arguing that OCGA § 17–10–6.2 required the trial court to impose a split sentence that included at least one year of probation. Hanh further contended that he was denied effective assistance of counsel and alleged prosecutorial and judicial misconduct with regard to the void sentence. Hanh concluded with a request to withdraw his guilty plea.
At a hearing on Hanh's motion, the court declared that the sentence was void and announced a sentence of 20 years, of which Hanh would serve 19 years in prison and the balance on probation. Hanh then reminded the trial court that he “ha[d] another matter,” but the trial court cut him off, concluded the hearing, and entered the amended sentence.
Hanh appeals, complaining that the trial court did not allow him to pursue at the hearing his claim that he was entitled to withdraw his guilty plea.
As noted above, Hanh's “Motion to Vacate Void Sentence” included a request to withdraw his guilty plea. This issue is controlled by our decision in Kaiser v. State, in which we approved a line of cases holding that “[w]here a void sentence has been entered, it is as if no sentence has been entered at all, and the defendant stands in the same position as if he had pled guilty and not yet been sentenced. And pursuant to OCGA § 17–7–93 (b), the defendant may withdraw his plea as of right prior to sentencing,” even if the motion was filed outside the term of court in which the original sentence was imposed. Because the original sentence was a nullity and Hanh filed a motion seeking to withdraw his guilty plea prior to resentencing, the trial court erred by not allowing Hanh to withdraw his plea of guilty prior to resentencing.
See Thompson v. State , 274 Ga. 818, 559 S.E.2d 730 (2002).
285 Ga.App. 63, 646 S.E.2d 84 (2007).
See, e.g., Mullins v. State , 134 Ga.App. 243, 214 S.E.2d 1 (1975).
Kaiser , supra at 66 (1), 646 S.E.2d 84. See also State v. Lewis , 298 Ga. 126, 130 n. 6, 779 S.E.2d 643 (2015) (“The defendant is statutorily entitled to withdraw his or her guilty plea ‘at any time before sentence is pronounced.’ ”) (citing OCGA 17–7–93 (b) ; punctuation omitted). But see Simmons v. State , 315 Ga.App. 82, 84–85, 726 S.E.2d 573 (2012) (holding that Kaiser did not apply where the defendant had availed himself of the First Offender Act, OCGA § 42–8–60 and thereby had not retained the right to withdraw his guilty plea); but see also OCGA §§ 17–10–6.2 (b) (first offender sentencing not available as punishment for child molestation unless OCGA § 16–6–4 (b) (2) applies and the victim is at least 14 but less than 16 years of age and the defendant is 18 years of age or younger and no more than four years older than the victim). The record in this case indicates that Hanh was not sentenced under the First Offender Act.
Kaiser , supra at 68–69 (1), 646 S.E.2d 84.
See Spargo v. State , 332 Ga.App. 410, 773 S.E.2d 35 (2015) (vacating a void sentence where the trial court failed to enter a split sentence for child molestation).
Kaiser , supra. See also Franks v. State , 323 Ga.App. 813, 814, 748 S.E.2d 291 (2013) (reversing the trial court's denial of a defendant's motion to withdraw a guilty plea where the original sentence was void and the motion was made prior to resentencing).
--------
Judgment reversed.
Dillard and Peterson, JJ., concur.