From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 13, 1930
171 N.E. 889 (N.Y. 1930)

Opinion

Argued May 5, 1930

Decided May 13, 1930

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Herman W. Bernstein for motion.

Gerson C. Young opposed.


The proceeding was instituted under subdivision 3 of section 773 of the Civil Practice Act. The appellant was a party to that proceeding. An order adjudging a party guilty of a civil contempt in proceedings supplemental to execution is not a final order. ( Matter of Steinman v. Conlon, 208 N.Y. 198.)

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.


Summaries of

Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 13, 1930
171 N.E. 889 (N.Y. 1930)
Case details for

Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Matter of ANNA HAND, Respondent, v. ORTSCHREIB BUILDING CORPORATION et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 13, 1930

Citations

171 N.E. 889 (N.Y. 1930)
171 N.E. 889

Citing Cases

Fox v. Capital Co.

Ex parte Boyd, 105 U.S. 647, 651-653; Le Roy v. Rogers, 3 Paige Ch. (N.Y.) 234; Hadden v. Spader, 20 Johns.…

NS United Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd. v. Cogent Fibre Inc.

Cogent is correct, and NSU does not dispute, that it is a "fundamental" principle of contract law that the…