From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammond v. Realty Leasing, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 25, 1977
342 So. 2d 915 (Ala. 1977)

Opinion

SC 2171, SC 2172.

February 25, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Houston County, Forrest L. Adams, J.

Francis H. Hare, Birmingham, for appellants.

Jere C. Segrest, Dothan, for appellee.


Two minor children of Marlin E. Hammond (one 8 years old, and one 5 years old) drowned in a pond on the defendant's property. On the day of this grievous occurrence, these children, without invitation of the property owner, went to play on the vacant lot on which the pond was located. While there, playing, sliding down a mound of dirt, looking for frogs, their apparent fun and good time was turned into a disaster.

Suit was filed by Hammond contending that the defendant was negligent by failing to exercise reasonable care in creating or permitting the existence of this dangerous condition. His theory of recovery did not include "attractive nuisance," "dangerous instrumentality," or "wantonness" — only simple negligence.

The defendant filed a motion to dismiss; it was granted, and this appeal is from the order of dismissal. We affirm on authority of Tolbert v. Gulsby, Ala., 333 So.2d 129 (1976), holding that:

"Under a negligence count, the duty owed by a landowner depends on the status of the injured party in relation to the defendant's land. See Mullins v. Pannell, 289 Ala. 252, 266 So.2d 862 (1972); Autrey v. Roebuck Park Baptist Church, 285 Ala. 76, 229 So.2d 469 (1969). If the injured party is determined to have been a trespasser, the landowner owes only the duty not to wantonly or intentionally injure him. City of Dothan v. Gulledge, 276 Ala. 433, 163 So.2d 217 (1964); Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. Green, 276 Ala. 120, 159 So.2d 823 (1964). `Under ordinary conditions trespassing children, or children on the land of another as bare licensees, occupy the same position as trespassing adults.' Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v Green, supra; Mullins v. Pannell, 289 Ala. 252, 266 So.2d 862 (1972). If plaintiff is found to have been on defendant's property with his consent or as his guest, but with no business purpose, he attains the status of licensee and is owed the duty not be willfully or wantonly injured or not to be negligently injured after the landowner has discovered his peril. Autrey v. Roebuck Park Baptist Church, 285 Ala. 76, 229 So.2d 469 (1969)."

Also, see Earnest v. Regent Pool, Inc., 288 Ala. 63, 257 So.2d 313 (1972).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hammond v. Realty Leasing, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 25, 1977
342 So. 2d 915 (Ala. 1977)
Case details for

Hammond v. Realty Leasing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Marlin E. HAMMOND, as Administrator, etc. v. REALTY LEASING, INC., a…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Feb 25, 1977

Citations

342 So. 2d 915 (Ala. 1977)

Citing Cases

Smith v. United States Steel Corp.

The affidavits do not raise any issue of fact as to these two theories. We affirm on authority of Hammond v.…

Pratt Capital, Inc. v. Boyett

"`To hold otherwise would enable the liberal amendment policy of Rule 15(a) to be employed in a way that is…