From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammel v. Speaker of the House of Representatives

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 1, 2013
829 N.W.2d 862 (Mich. 2013)

Opinion

Docket No. 145916. COA No. 309484.

2013-05-1

State Representative Richard HAMMEL, State Representative Kate Segal, State Representative Mark Meadows, State Representative Woodrow Stanley, State Representative Steven Lindberg, and State Representative Jeff Irwin, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. SPEAKER OF the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Speaker Pro Tem of the House of Representatives, House of Representatives Majority Floor Leader, and House of Representatives, Defendants–Appellees.


Prior report: 297 Mich.App. 641, 825 N.W.2d 616.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED.The application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Hammel v. Speaker of the House of Representatives

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 1, 2013
829 N.W.2d 862 (Mich. 2013)
Case details for

Hammel v. Speaker of the House of Representatives

Case Details

Full title:State Representative Richard HAMMEL, State Representative Kate Segal…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

829 N.W.2d 862 (Mich. 2013)
493 Mich. 973

Citing Cases

City of Pontiac Retired Emps. Ass'n v. Schimmel

Id.On May 1, 2013, the Michigan Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs' application for leave to appeal the…

City of Pontiac Retired Emps. Ass'n v. Schimmel

Id.On May 1, 2013, the Michigan Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs' application for leave to appeal the…