From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Williams

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1799
3 N.C. 101 (N.C. Super. 1799)

Opinion

(Spring Riding, 1799.)

THIS case now being on, MOORE, J., was of opinion that the witness was incompetent.


NOTE. — See S. c. 2 N.C. 139, and the note thereto. See, also, Sanders v. Ferrill, 23 N.C. 97, which holds that where the subscribing witness to any instrument, except a negotiable one, becomes interested in a suit brought by him, his handwriting may be proved to establish the execution of the instrument, whether his interest was thrown upon him by operation of law or was acquired by his own voluntary act.

(102)


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Williams

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1799
3 N.C. 101 (N.C. Super. 1799)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:HAMILTON v. MARY WILLIAMS

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1799

Citations

3 N.C. 101 (N.C. Super. 1799)