From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Conway

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 6, 2008
03-CV-527S (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2008)

Opinion

03-CV-527S.

February 6, 2008


ORDER


On January 28, 2008, this Court issued a Decision and Order (Docket No. 63) that directed the Clerk of the Court to terminate Ray Pierce as a Defendant. However, Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Pierce for use of excessive force has not been dismissed. Accordingly, the docket should be corrected to show that Ray Pierce remains a Defendant in this action.

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that the portion of this Court's prior Decision and Order (Docket No. 63) that terminated Ray Pierce as a Defendant is VACATED.

FURTHER, that the Clerk of the Court shall reinstate Ray Pierce as a Defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Conway

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Feb 6, 2008
03-CV-527S (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Conway

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. JAMES CONWAY, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Feb 6, 2008

Citations

03-CV-527S (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2008)

Citing Cases

Shakur v. Ryan

See Baker v. Welch, 2003 WL 22901051, *18 (S.D.N.Y.2003) (noting in dicta that "[a] male prisoner has no…