From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamill v. Hamill

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District
Dec 12, 1962
38 Ill. App. 2d 180 (Ill. App. Ct. 1962)

Summary

In Hamill v. Hamill, 38 Ill. App.2d 180, 186 N.E.2d 781, the court held that petitioner's loss of income under the G.I. Bill of Rights was not a sufficient showing of change of financial circumstances warranting modification of the decree.

Summary of this case from Graham v. Graham

Opinion

Gen. No. 62-O-8. (Abstract of Decision.)

December 12, 1962.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. RICHARD T. CARTER, Judge, presiding. Affirmed.

Alan J. Dixon, of Belleville, for appellant;

Fleming, Fiedler Hotto, of East St. Louis, for appellee.


Not to be published in full.


Summaries of

Hamill v. Hamill

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District
Dec 12, 1962
38 Ill. App. 2d 180 (Ill. App. Ct. 1962)

In Hamill v. Hamill, 38 Ill. App.2d 180, 186 N.E.2d 781, the court held that petitioner's loss of income under the G.I. Bill of Rights was not a sufficient showing of change of financial circumstances warranting modification of the decree.

Summary of this case from Graham v. Graham
Case details for

Hamill v. Hamill

Case Details

Full title:Charles P. Hamill, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janet B. Hamill…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 12, 1962

Citations

38 Ill. App. 2d 180 (Ill. App. Ct. 1962)
186 N.E.2d 781

Citing Cases

Graham v. Graham

The modification was affirmed on appeal. In Hamill v. Hamill, 38 Ill. App.2d 180, 186 N.E.2d 781, the court…