From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hames v. Hames

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 4, 1965
140 S.E.2d 844 (Ga. 1965)

Opinion

22756.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 11, 1965.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 4, 1965.

Equitable petition. Chattooga Superior Court. Before Judge Fariss.

G. W. Langford, for plaintiff in error.

Shaw, Stolz Fletcher, contra.


The only question presented by the assignment of error in the present case is whether the Act of 1941, as amended (Ga. L. 1941, pp. 487-489; Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 313, 314), embodied in Code Ann. § 67-1308, is applicable to a note and security deed given to secure the same where the note matured before the Act, according to its provisions, became effective as a statute of the State. This precise question is answered in the negative in the case of Todd v. Morgan, 215 Ga. 220, 221 (2) ( 109 S.E.2d 803). The Todd case is controlling here.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 11, 1965 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 4, 1965.


Summaries of

Hames v. Hames

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 4, 1965
140 S.E.2d 844 (Ga. 1965)
Case details for

Hames v. Hames

Case Details

Full title:HAMES v. HAMES

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Feb 4, 1965

Citations

140 S.E.2d 844 (Ga. 1965)
140 S.E.2d 844

Citing Cases

Smith v. Merchants Farmers Bank

NICHOLS, Justice. 1. The trial court relying upon the decisions in Todd v. Morgan, 215 Ga. 220 ( 109 S.E.2d…