From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamel-Schwulst v. Negrotto

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 11, 2010
Case No. 3:08cv529/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 11, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv529/MCR/EMT.

February 11, 2010


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 8, 2010. (Doc. 157). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant MERS' "Amended Motion to Dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3) and (6) or Alternatively Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) and Supporting Memorandum" (doc. 138) and Defendants Universal Surety of America and The Continental Insurance Company's "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint or Alternatively Motion to Transfer Venue" (doc. 145) are GRANTED to the extent Defendants seek transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

3. The clerk shall forthwith TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

4. The clerk shall close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hamel-Schwulst v. Negrotto

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 11, 2010
Case No. 3:08cv529/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 11, 2010)
Case details for

Hamel-Schwulst v. Negrotto

Case Details

Full title:MARY HAMEL-SCHWULST, Plaintiff, v. JEFFEREY P. NEGROTTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Feb 11, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv529/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 11, 2010)

Citing Cases

Trump v. Simon & Schuster Inc.

In response to a venue challenge, the plaintiff has the burden to show that venue in his chosen forum is…

BROWNSBERGER v. GEXA ENERGY, LP

Thus, as determined by § 1391(b)(2), venue is proper in Texas — not Florida. See e.g. Hamel-Schwulst v…