From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamby v. Neurological Associates P. C

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 30, 1979
256 S.E.2d 378 (Ga. 1979)

Opinion

34859.

SUBMITTED MAY 4, 1979.

DECIDED MAY 30, 1979.

Action for damages; constitutional question. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Alverson.

Cullen M. Ward, William C. Lanham, Clark H. McGehee, for appellant.

Robert G. Tanner, Sidney F. Wheeler, T. M. Smith, Jr., for appellees.


Appellant Zelma Hamby raises the question whether the two year statute of limitation for loss of consortium in medical malpractice cases violates equal protection. Code Ann. § 3-1102. The statute of limitation is four years for all other loss of consortium actions. Code Ann. § 3-1004. She concedes, and we agree, that the separate classification of medical malpractice actions is a rational exercise of the legislative power. Code Ann. Ch. 3-11. It thus follows that for loss of consortium arising out of medical malpractice, there is also a rational basis for different treatment.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Jordan, J., who concurs in the judgment only.


SUBMITTED MAY 4, 1979 — DECIDED MAY 30, 1979.


Summaries of

Hamby v. Neurological Associates P. C

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 30, 1979
256 S.E.2d 378 (Ga. 1979)
Case details for

Hamby v. Neurological Associates P. C

Case Details

Full title:HAMBY v. NEUROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 30, 1979

Citations

256 S.E.2d 378 (Ga. 1979)
256 S.E.2d 378

Citing Cases

Shessel v. Stroup

W. L. Prosser, Law of Torts, 4th ed., § 30, page 144 (1974). We dealt with the Limitations of Actions for…

Quinn v. Stafford

3. In Allrid v. Emory University, supra, we held, in accordance with Hamby v. Neurological Assoc., P.C., 243…