From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ham v. Goodrich

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Jun 15, 2010
Case No. 7:10-CV-40 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 7:10-CV-40 (HL).

June 15, 2010


ORDER


The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 7), entered May 18, 2010, is before the Court. Petitioner has not filed a written objection to the Recommendation, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's decision. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the Recommendation. Thurbert E. Baker is dismissed with prejudice as a party respondent in this matter.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ham v. Goodrich

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Jun 15, 2010
Case No. 7:10-CV-40 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Ham v. Goodrich

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD LEE HAM JR., Petitioner, v. BARRY GOODRICH and THURBERT E. BAKER…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Jun 15, 2010

Citations

Case No. 7:10-CV-40 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 15, 2010)

Citing Cases

WEEKS v. LUND

Therefore, mere payment of the purchase money is not sufficient to authorize a decree for specific…

Wiggin v. Wiggin

The entry of Hetta Wiggin into possession under the agreement would be the act of a wrongdoer, for which she…