From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hallman v. State Parole Board

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 24, 1966
216 A.2d 387 (N.J. 1966)

Opinion

Argued December 7, 1965 —

Decided January 24, 1966.

Mr. Edward G. D'Alessandro argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Friedman D'Alessandro, attorneys).

Mr. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney, Mr. Urbaniak, of counsel).


The opinion of the court was delivered


In this proceeding Hallman attacked the order of the State Parole Board revoking his parole and recommitting him to prison. It now appears that since the revocation he has been convicted of crime again in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. That offense of which he has been found guilty in substantial part was the basis upon which the revocation was based. Under the circumstances the issue presented to us is now moot. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

For dismissal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and HALL — 5.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Hallman v. State Parole Board

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 24, 1966
216 A.2d 387 (N.J. 1966)
Case details for

Hallman v. State Parole Board

Case Details

Full title:TERRELL H. HALLMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE PAROLE BOARD…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 24, 1966

Citations

216 A.2d 387 (N.J. 1966)
216 A.2d 387

Citing Cases

White v. New Jersey State Parole Board

Revocation of parole on a charge that the parolee committed a criminal offense requires proof either in the…

State v. Johnson

On appeal, defendant for the first time argues that the comments of Judge Brody and the prosecutor at the…