From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 7, 2019
2019-1675 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2019)

Opinion

2019-1675

11-07-2019

WILLIAM T. HALL, Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee

BARRY P. ALLEN, The Law Office of Barry P. Allen, Nashville, TN, argued for claimant-appellant. MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by JOSEPH H. HUNT, ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR.; MARTIE ADELMAN, BRIAN D. GRIFFIN, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 18-3384, Judge Mary J. Schoelen, Judge Margaret C. Bartley, Judge Michael P. Allen.

JUDGMENT

BARRY P. ALLEN, The Law Office of Barry P. Allen, Nashville, TN, argued for claimant-appellant. MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by JOSEPH H. HUNT, ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR.; MARTIE ADELMAN, BRIAN D. GRIFFIN, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 7, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Hall v. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 7, 2019
2019-1675 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2019)
Case details for

Hall v. Wilkie

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM T. HALL, Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT WILKIE, SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 7, 2019

Citations

2019-1675 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2019)

Citing Cases

Newhall v. Provost

No amendment cutting off the rights of a party, as they were under the original return, can be properly…

Brusie v. Gates

Parol proof, was not admissible to affect the sufficiency of the return, nor could it be amended as against…