From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. U.S.

U.S.
Jun 21, 1999
527 U.S. 1029 (1999)

Summary

affirming defendant's conviction for violating a federal statute prohibiting a person subject to a domestic violence protective order from possessing a firearm, in spite of his lack of notice that such conduct was illegal, because when defendant threatened his estranged wife with a firearm, he violated a court order requiring him to refrain from abusing and harassing his wife, thus was no longer an "ordinary citizen" and "[l]ike a felon a person in [defendant's] position [could not] reasonably expect to be free from regulation when possessing a firearm"

Summary of this case from State v. Bryant

Opinion

No. 98-9462.

June 21, 1999.


ORDERS

C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 165 F. 3d 1095.


Summaries of

Hall v. U.S.

U.S.
Jun 21, 1999
527 U.S. 1029 (1999)

affirming defendant's conviction for violating a federal statute prohibiting a person subject to a domestic violence protective order from possessing a firearm, in spite of his lack of notice that such conduct was illegal, because when defendant threatened his estranged wife with a firearm, he violated a court order requiring him to refrain from abusing and harassing his wife, thus was no longer an "ordinary citizen" and "[l]ike a felon a person in [defendant's] position [could not] reasonably expect to be free from regulation when possessing a firearm"

Summary of this case from State v. Bryant
Case details for

Hall v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:HALL v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 21, 1999

Citations

527 U.S. 1029 (1999)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Matthews

See Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 302 (1973) ("[W]here constitutional rights directly affecting the…

United States v. Larson

the extent that Larson argues that his prosecution under § 922(g)(8) violates his procedural due process…