From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 25, 1953
263 S.W.2d 563 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)

Opinion

No. 26646.

November 25, 1953.

Appeal from the District Court, Randall County, Henry S. Bishop, J.

George S. McCarthy, Amarillo, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


Appellant was convicted under the third count of an indictment charging him and three others with robbery of one Gary D. Jennings. The jury assessed the minimum punishment of 5 years in the penitentiary.

The sole question presented in the brief and oral argument in appellant's behalf relates to remarks of the assistant district attorney during their arguments to the jury.

The question raised cannot be considered for several reasons.

First, notice of appeal was given on January 10, 1953, when appellant's motion for new trial was overruled, and the statement of facts wherein appellant seeks to raise the question was not filed in the trial court until Mary 1, 1953.

Art. 759a, V.A.C.C.P. requires that the statement of facts be filed in the trial court within 90 days 'after the date of giving notice of appeal'.

Second, we have held that objections to argument cannot be preserved as a part of the statement of facts, but require an independent bill of exception. McCutcheon v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 252 S.W.2d 175; Hernandez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 262 S.W.2d 200.

We find nothing in the amendment to art. 759a, V.A.C.C.P. to alter this requirement.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 25, 1953
263 S.W.2d 563 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)
Case details for

Hall v. State

Case Details

Full title:HALL v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 25, 1953

Citations

263 S.W.2d 563 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)
159 Tex. Crim. 342

Citing Cases

Watson v. State

* "The jury is not bound to accept all or any of the testimony of a witness, even though uncontradicted. It…

Soto v. State

It has been held that objections to jury argument cannot be preserved as a part of the statement of facts but…