From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 15, 2018
254 So. 3d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D18-1534

10-15-2018

Dago Bruce HALE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Anne M. Rush, Alachua, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda Stokes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Anne M. Rush, Alachua, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda Stokes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James , 810 So.2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (observing that whether a motion to disqualify was timely filed generally will involve a factual determination, and thus, is reviewed to determine whether competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court's ruling).

Roberts, Rowe, and Ray, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hale v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 15, 2018
254 So. 3d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Hale v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAGO BRUCE HALE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Oct 15, 2018

Citations

254 So. 3d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)