From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. Ripton

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1923
138 N.E. 476 (N.Y. 1923)

Summary

In Hale v. Ripton (234 N.Y. 631), "The alleged cause of action was based upon certain provisions of the contract whereby the contractor agreed to be responsible for and repair any damage arising from the carrying out of the contract."

Summary of this case from Lewis v. Dunbar Sullivan Dredging Co.

Opinion

Argued December 4, 1922

Decided January 9, 1923

Arthur V.D. Chamberlain for appellant.

William F. Strang for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Not voting: McLAUGHLIN, J.


Summaries of

Hale v. Ripton

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1923
138 N.E. 476 (N.Y. 1923)

In Hale v. Ripton (234 N.Y. 631), "The alleged cause of action was based upon certain provisions of the contract whereby the contractor agreed to be responsible for and repair any damage arising from the carrying out of the contract."

Summary of this case from Lewis v. Dunbar Sullivan Dredging Co.
Case details for

Hale v. Ripton

Case Details

Full title:CLARA A. HALE et al., Respondents, v . MICHAEL H. RIPTON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 9, 1923

Citations

138 N.E. 476 (N.Y. 1923)
138 N.E. 476

Citing Cases

H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.

The same rule of law would control whether the action be in equity or law. It has been applied and enforced…

Lewis v. Dunbar Sullivan Dredging Co.

Mr. Justice TAYLOR, of this Department, writing in Wilson v. Costich Co., Inc. ( 231 A.D. 346) states that…