holding that the Arizona Department of Corrections is not a "person" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summary of this case from Max v. HernandezNo. 93-353.
November 1, 1993, October TERM, 1993.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 993 F. 2d 1387.
holding that the Arizona Department of Corrections is not a "person" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summary of this case from Max v. Hernandezholding that Arizona Department of Corrections is not a "person" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summary of this case from Cornwell v. California Bd. of Barbering and Cosmetologyholding that the Arizona Department of Corrections is not a "person" within the meaning of § 1983
Summary of this case from Taormina v. California Dept. of CorrectionsFull title:HALE ET AL. v. ARIZONA ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 1, 1993
Inmates are paid 50 cents an hour for their work. Hale v. Arizona, 967 F.2d 1356, 1360 (9th Cir. 1992),…
Young v. Hollingsworth"It is axiomatic that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and as such are under a continuing…