From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hainsworth v. Martin

U.S.
Nov 15, 1965
382 U.S. 109 (1965)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.

No. 477.

Decided November 15, 1965.

Judgment of Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Third Supreme Judicial District, 386 S.W.2d 202, vacated and remanded to that court.

Robert W. Hainsworth, appellant, pro se.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Hawthorne Phillips, Pat Bailey and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.


This cause having become moot in the light of the enactment of the Texas Apportionment Act of 1965, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas, is vacated, and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as by that court may be deemed appropriate.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Hainsworth v. Martin

U.S.
Nov 15, 1965
382 U.S. 109 (1965)
Case details for

Hainsworth v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:HAINSWORTH v . MARTIN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 15, 1965

Citations

382 U.S. 109 (1965)

Citing Cases

Lucas v. U.S.

p. 1987); Smith v. State, 683 S.W.2d 393, 399 n. 2 (Tex.Cr.App. 1984); Lindsay v. Papageorgiou, 751 S.W.2d…