From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haines v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
May 16, 2007
CV NO. 06-cv-4046-JPG-DGW (S.D. Ill. May. 16, 2007)

Opinion

CV NO. 06-cv-4046-JPG-DGW.

May 16, 2007


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice (Doc. 48) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) signed by all parties who remain in this case. Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) allows dismissal by a plaintiff without a court order by filing such a stipulation. Therefore, the Court finds that the third party claims in this action are DISMISSED with prejudice and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Haines v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
May 16, 2007
CV NO. 06-cv-4046-JPG-DGW (S.D. Ill. May. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Haines v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST EDWIN HAINES, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: May 16, 2007

Citations

CV NO. 06-cv-4046-JPG-DGW (S.D. Ill. May. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

Rittenhouse v. Railway Co.

Obliviousness is a necessary and indispensable element in a case under the humanitarian doctrine and unless…

Norton v. Wheelock

Buesching v. Gas Co., 73 Mo. 219; Briscoe v. Railroad, 200 Mo. App. 691; Liston v. Railroad, 149 Mo. App.…