Opinion
4:21-cv-171-AW-MJF
09-27-2021
JOHN HAILE, Plaintiff, v. MARK S. INCH, et al., Defendants.
Michael J. Frank, United States Magistrate Judge
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This prisoner civil rights case, filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983, is before the court on referral from the clerk of the court. On May 9, 2021, the undersigned ordered Plaintiff to submit a fully completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with: (1) the requisite Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate signed by a jail official, and (2) an attached printout of the transactions in Plaintiff's inmate trust account during the six-month period of incarceration preceding the filing of the suit. (Doc. 4). The undersigned warned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the order likely would result in dismissal of this case. (Id.). Plaintiff has not complied with the
The District Court referred this case to the undersigned to address preliminary matters and to make recommendations regarding dispositive matters. See N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 72.2(C); see also 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), (C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
order and has not responded to the show cause order issued by the undersigned on June 22, 2021. (Doc. 5).
The show cause order imposed a twenty-one-day response deadline. (Doc. 5). The undersigned provided Plaintiff 30 additional days to respond in addition to the showcause deadline.
Based on the foregoing, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that:
1. This case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with orders of this court.
2. The clerk of court be directed to close this case file.
“Federal courts possess an inherent power to dismiss a complaint for failure to comply with a court order.” Foudy v. Indian River Cnty. Sheriff's Office, 845 F.3d 1117, 1126 (11th Cir. 2017) (citations omitted); Wilson v. Sargent, 313 F.3d 1315, 1320-21 (11th Cir. 2002) (noting that courts may dismiss a prisoner's case for failing to pay the initial partial filing fee after issuing an order to show cause).
At Pensacola, Florida, this 12th of August, 2021.
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES
Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of the report and recommendation. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only and does not control. An objecting party must serve a copy of the objections on all other parties. A party who fails to object to the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1; 28 U.S.C. 636.