From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hager v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jun 29, 2021
2:21-CV-2472 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-2472

06-29-2021

JOSHUA E. HAGER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, ROSS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


Kimberly A. Jolson Magistrate Judge.

ORDER

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On June 4, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts recommending that this action be dismissed. (Doc. 2.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

Petitioner has waived the right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court therefore DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hager v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jun 29, 2021
2:21-CV-2472 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Hager v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA E. HAGER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, ROSS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-2472 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 29, 2021)

Citing Cases

Gilmore v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

True, as the R&R explained, the “COVID-19 pandemic may qualify as an extraordinary circumstance justifying…

Camelin v. Warden, Se. Corr. Inst.

True, as the R&R explained, the “COVID-19 pandemic may qualify as an extraordinary circumstance justifying…