Opinion
Submitted March 10, 1891
Decided April 14, 1891
Edward F. O'Dwyer for appellant.
Almet F. Jenks for respondent.
Per Curiam opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hagan v. City of Brooklyn
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1891
126 N.Y. 643 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Hagan v. City of Brooklyn
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1891
126 N.Y. 643 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Hagan v. City of Brooklyn
Case Details
Full title:KATE HAGAN, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v . THE CITY OF BROOKLYN…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 14, 1891
Citations
126 N.Y. 643 (N.Y. 1891)
36 N.Y. St. Rptr. 944
27 N.E. 852
Citing Cases
Matter of Amkraut v. Hults
The suspension prior to determination did not exceed 30 days. And in Hagan v. City of Brooklyn ( 126 N.Y.…
Webb v. WilliamsonTo permit him to sue for the salary of the office under such circumstances would be to permit him to try the…