From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haddad v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 31, 2014
No. 1:13-cv-1028 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 31, 2014)

Opinion

No. 1:13-cv-1028

12-31-2014

RAMONA SAMARA HADDAD, Plaintiff, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, ET AL., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Having granted Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 16) and having dismissed all the claims in the complaint, pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, JUDGMENT enters in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.

THIS ACTION IS TERMINATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: December 31, 2014

/s/ Paul L. Maloney

Paul L. Maloney

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Haddad v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 31, 2014
No. 1:13-cv-1028 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Haddad v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:RAMONA SAMARA HADDAD, Plaintiff, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 31, 2014

Citations

No. 1:13-cv-1028 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Singh v. United States

See Makhamreh, 2020 WL 6146593 at fn 2 ("The Sixth Circuit 'reviews the BIA's decision as the final agency…

Simaga v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Servs.

When an I-130 Petition is “filed based on marriage, the petitioner must show by a preponderance of the…