From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hackel v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles

Supreme Court of California
Feb 24, 1930
209 Cal. 780 (Cal. 1930)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 11632.

February 24, 1930.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles and Charles L. Bogue, Judge thereof, to terminate the prosecution of petitioner on a misdemeanor charge. Peremptory writ issued.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Cooper Collings for Petitioner.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, S.V.O. Prichard, Deputy County Counsel, Lloyd S. Nix, City Prosecutor, and Ray P. Brockman, Deputy City Prosecutor, for Respondents.


THE COURT.

[1] This is a proceeding in mandate similar in all essential particulars to the preceding cases of Harris v. Municipal Court et al. (L.A. No. 11787), ante, p. 55 [ 285 P. 699], and Gutterman v. Municipal Court et al. (L.A. No. 11605), ante, p. 65 [295 P. 703], this day decided. The complaint against the petitioner for usury, a misdemeanor, was filed in the respondent court on September 23, 1927, and the warrant was served on April 18, 1929, and nothing was done by the prosecution in the meantime to bring the case on for trial. Proceedings similar to those in the other cases were taken in the respondent court to bring about a dismissal of the action with like result. On the authority of those cases the peremptory writ of mandamus is ordered issued as prayed.


Summaries of

Hackel v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles

Supreme Court of California
Feb 24, 1930
209 Cal. 780 (Cal. 1930)
Case details for

Hackel v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:E.M. HACKEL, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES et…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 24, 1930

Citations

209 Cal. 780 (Cal. 1930)
285 P. 704

Citing Cases

People v. Rogers

The trial court, in granting defendant's motion to dismiss for a denial of a speedy trial, appears to have…

People v. Lawson

Rice v. Superior Court (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 200 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 389], and People v. Archerd, supra, 3 Cal.3d…