From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'n

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
May 28, 1959
269 F.2d 517 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

Summary

affirming sua sponte application by district court

Summary of this case from Nixon v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 14925.

Argued May 15, 1959.

Decided May 28, 1959.

Mr. Joseph S. Gullo, Arlington, Va., for appellants.

Mr. Paul Daniel, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Carlyle C. Ring, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'n. Mr. James R. Worsley, Jr., Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellee Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'n.

Mr. Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, and Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee District of Columbia.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.


This case was dismissed by the District Court apparently on the ground of res judicata, the court taking judicial notice of the previous case between the parties, the details of which are spelled out in Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Association, 1957, 101 U.S.App. D.C. 167, 247 F.2d 573.

In all its essential particulars, the present action is the same as that of the previous case, and the District Court correctly applied the doctrine of res judicata.

While the defense of laches was interposed, it is not necessary that we pass on that issue.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'n

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
May 28, 1959
269 F.2d 517 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

affirming sua sponte application by district court

Summary of this case from Nixon v. U.S.

affirming dismissal under res judicata where district court took judicial notice of previous case

Summary of this case from STURDZA v. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

affirming dismissal on ground of res judicata where district court took judicial notice of previous case

Summary of this case from Smith v. Suter

affirming dismissal on ground of res judicata where district court took judicial notice of previous case

Summary of this case from IVEY v. PAULSON

In Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'n, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 70, 269 F.2d 517 (D.C. Cir. 1959), the court held that a judgment precluded a later action which was identical to the first "[i]n all its essential particulars."

Summary of this case from Amos v. Shelton
Case details for

Gullo v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:Joseph S. GULLO and Vivian B. Gullo, Appellants, v. VETERANS COOPERATIVE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: May 28, 1959

Citations

269 F.2d 517 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. United States

Although res judicata is an affirmative defense that typically must be pled, courts "may raise the res…

Taxation with Repre. of Wash. v. Regan

Although collateral estoppel and res judicata are waivable affirmative defenses under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(c), some…