From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guilbeau v. Yamaha Motor Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 9, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-740 (M.D. La. Oct. 9, 2012)

Summary

In Guilbeau v. United States, 288 Fed. 731 (5th C.C.A.), where the charge was of an unlawful sale of certain derivatives and salts of opium, to wit, four grains of morphine sulphate, the evidence showed the sale of morphine hydrochloride.

Summary of this case from McIntosh v. United States

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-740

10-09-2012

SPENCER W. GUILBEAU, WILFRED M. GUILBEAU AND MELISSA M. GUILBEAU v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICAN AND YAMAHA MOTOR CO., LTD.

J.E. CULLENS, JR. EDWARD J. WALTERS, JR. Walters, Papillion, Thomas, Cullens, LLC Counsel for Plaintiffs, Spencer W. Guilbeau, Wilfred M. Guilbeau and Melissa M. Guilbeau DUPLASS, ZWAIN, BOURGEOIS, PFISTER & WEINSTOCK JOSEPH G. GLASS (#25397) Counsel for Defendants, Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. and Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America


JUDGE: JAMES J. BRADY


MAG: CHRISTINE A. NOLAND


AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

COME NOW Plaintiffs, Spencer W. Guilbeau, Wilfred M. Guilbeau and Melissa M. Guilbeau (Plaintiffs), and Defendants, Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America and Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. (Yamaha Defendants), by and through their respective attorneys, and hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that this matter should be dismissed, with prejudice.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action and all claims in the action are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees.

Section I.B.2.a. of the Common Benefit Order [Doc. #2021] ("CBO") entered in the proceeding styled In Re: Yamaha Motor Corp. Rhino ATV Products Liability Litigation, Master File No. 3-09-MD-2016-JBC ("MDL 2016"), requires the Yamaha Defendants to withhold five percent (5%) from the total settlement amount payable to Plaintiff. Counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for the Yamaha Defendants certify that a five percent (5%) assessment against the recovery of this action has been withheld and deposited into the Common Benefit Fund. See Exhibit "A," Certificate of Compliance.

It is ORDERED this 9th day of October, 2012.

_________________

HONORABLE JAMES J. BRADY
AGREED TO: _________________
J.E. CULLENS, JR.
EDWARD J. WALTERS, JR.
Walters, Papillion, Thomas, Cullens, LLC
Counsel for Plaintiffs, Spencer W. Guilbeau, Wilfred M. Guilbeau and Melissa M.
Guilbeau
DUPLASS, ZWAIN, BOURGEOIS,
PFISTER & WEINSTOCK
_________________
JOSEPH G. GLASS (#25397)
Counsel for Defendants, Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
and Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America

EXHIBIT A


CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


MDL COMMON BENEFIT ORDER

Pursuant to Section I.B.3 of the MDL Common Benefit Order ("CBO"), entered in MDL 2016, on October 6, 2010, and as supplemented on April 1, 2011, counsel for Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America, and Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd. (the "Yamaha Defendants") and the undersigned plaintiffs' counsel hereby certify that a 5% assessment against the recovery in this action by Spencer Wayne Guilbeau, Wilfred M. Guilbeau and Melissa M Guilbeau has been withheld and paid to the Common Benefit Account.

A copy of this Certificate shall accompany the Order of Dismissal in this action.

By: _________________

Joseph G. Glass

Counsel for the Yamaha Defendants

By: _________________

J.E. Cullens, Jr.

Counsel for Plaintiffs


Summaries of

Guilbeau v. Yamaha Motor Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 9, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-740 (M.D. La. Oct. 9, 2012)

In Guilbeau v. United States, 288 Fed. 731 (5th C.C.A.), where the charge was of an unlawful sale of certain derivatives and salts of opium, to wit, four grains of morphine sulphate, the evidence showed the sale of morphine hydrochloride.

Summary of this case from McIntosh v. United States
Case details for

Guilbeau v. Yamaha Motor Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SPENCER W. GUILBEAU, WILFRED M. GUILBEAU AND MELISSA M. GUILBEAU v. YAMAHA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Oct 9, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-740 (M.D. La. Oct. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

White v. State

It is hornbook that, absent a requirement of showing system or intent, evidence of offenses not charged in…

State v. Linder

Respondent attempts to distinguish the Smith case upon the ground that it was a prosecution against a…