Summary
declining to grant habeas relief where police detective could not recall name of officer who showed store employee a photographic lineup, officer who showed lineup could not write report and petitioner argued prosecution destroyed evidence of identity of store employee
Summary of this case from United States v. WilliamsOpinion
NO. SACV 12-1022-GHK (AGR)
11-18-2014
JOHN E. GUIDRY, II, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: 11/18/14
/s/_________
GEORGE H. KING
United States District Judge