Opinion
No. 13-56240
05-19-2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 2:13-cv-01856-MWF-JEM MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
John A. Guidice appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his defamation action arising from events that occurred on Vandenberg Air Force Base. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim, Pride v. Correa, 719 F.3d 1130, 1133 (9th Cir. 2013), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Guidice's defamation claim because Priest's statement that Guidice shouted is not actionable. See Taus v. Loftus, 151 P.3d 1185, 1209 (Cal. 2007) (setting forth elements of a defamation claim and explaining that an expression of opinion cannot form the basis of a defamation action); Grillo v. Smith, 193 Cal. Rptr. 414, 417 (Ct. App. 1983) ("The words 'angry,' 'shouted,' [and] 'stormed,' . . . fall clearly on the opinion side of the line. They are subjective words . . . of the sort which have been found to be opinion as a matter of law frequently in the past.").
AFFIRMED.