Opinion
C23-0395JLR
06-15-2023
GS HOLISTIC LLC, Plaintiff, v. MARTIAL INC., et al., Defendants.
ORDER
JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC's (“GS Holistic”) motion for a 60-day extension of time to perfect service on Defendant Nasim Choudhry. (Mot. (Dkt. # 11).) The court GRANTS GS Holistic's motion for an extension of time.
Although the motion is noted for consideration on June 23, 2023 (see id.), the court sees no reason to delay issuing a decision on the motion. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 1 (authorizing the court to construe the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding”).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 requires a plaintiff to serve the defendant with a summons and a copy of the complaint and sets forth the specific requirements for doing so. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4. Rule 4(m), which provides the timeframe in which service must be effectuated, states in relevant part:
If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court-on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.Id.
GS Holistic filed this action on March 16, 2023. (Compl. (Dkt. # 1).) As a result, Rule 4(m)'s 90-day deadline for effectuating service of process expired on Wednesday, June 14, 2023. Fed. R. Civ. P 4(m). On April 24, 2023, GS Holistic filed affidavits of service on Defendants Martial Inc. and Imtiaz Ahmed Mir. (Affs. of Service (Dkt. ## 7-8).) Although Mr. Choudhry is aware of this action (see Answer (Dkt. # 9)), GS Holistic represents that its process server has attempted to serve Mr. Choudhry several times but has been unsuccessful (Mot. ¶ 3). GS Holistic now asks the court to extend the Rule 4(m) deadline by 60 days to allow it to perfect service on Mr. Choudhry “either personally or by publication.” (Id. ¶ 6.)
The court finds that GS Holistic has not demonstrated good cause for its failure to effectuate service on Mr. Choudhry before the Rule 4(m) deadline. Nevertheless, the court GRANTS GS Holistic's motion for a 60-day extension of the deadline to perfect service (Dkt. # 11).GS Holistic shall file proof of service on Mr. Choudhry by no later than August 13, 2023. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal without prejudice of GS Holistic's claims against Mr. Choudhry. Further extensions of the deadline to serve Mr. Choudhry will not be granted absent exceptional circumstances.
This order does not grant GS Holistic leave to serve Mr. Choudhry by publication. If GS Holistic seeks to serve Mr. Choudhry by publication, it must file a motion for leave to do so. See Pascua v. Heil, 108 P.3d 1253, 1257 (Wash.Ct.App. 2005) (explaining the standard for granting leave to serve a defendant by publication in Washington).
Under Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 10(e)(3), the law firm, mailing address, and telephone number of the attorney preparing the paper should be printed or typed at the bottom of each page of a motion or other filing. In addition, Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 10(e)(5) requires line numbers in the left margin of each page of a motion or other filing. Here, the footer of GS Holistic's motion contains contact information for The Ticktin Law Firm, even though the only attorney who has appeared in this action is Brett C. Harris of Virgo Law LLC. (See Mot.; Dkt.) In addition, there are no line numbers on the pleading paper. (See Mot.) Accordingly, the court ORDERS counsel for GS Holistic to carefully review the court's local rules and to ensure compliance with those rules in all future filings. Failure to comply with the court's local rules may result in sanctions.