From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gruenwald v. Polatseck

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2014
114 A.D.3d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-26

Aron GRUENWALD, et al., respondents, v. Aron POLATSECK, et al., appellants.

Melito & Adolfsen P.C., New York, N.Y. (Louis G. Adolfsen and Robert Ely of counsel), for appellants. Frank & Seskin, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Scott H. Seskin of counsel), for respondents.


Melito & Adolfsen P.C., New York, N.Y. (Louis G. Adolfsen and Robert Ely of counsel), for appellants. Frank & Seskin, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Scott H. Seskin of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated May 16, 2013, which denied their motion to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to Rockland County.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, all papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries ( see CPLR 511 [d] ).

The plaintiff Aron Gruenwald (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) allegedly was injured when he was struck by a motor vehicle while crossing an intersection in Rockland County. The plaintiffs commenced this action against the owners and operator of the vehicle, placing venue in Kings County based upon their purported residence in that county.

The defendants served a timely demand for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 511(b) and, within 15 days thereafter, made a motion to transfer venue to a proper venue pursuant to CPLR 503(a), 510, and 511, alleging that the plaintiffs did not reside in Kings County at the time of the commencement of this action, and that none of the other parties resided in Kings County. In support of their motion, the defendants submitted evidence, including the plaintiffs' driving records, various hospital records, a United States Postal Service confirmation, and ledger entries from the Rockland Kosher Market demonstrating purchases by the injured plaintiff at his residence in Rockland County immediately prior to and just after the date of the commencement of the action, which established, prima facie, that the plaintiffs resided in Rockland County ( see Forbes v. Rubinovich, 94 A.D.3d 809, 943 N.Y.S.2d 120).

In opposition, the injured plaintiff claimed that after his release from the hospital he moved into his parents' apartment in Kings County, where he continued to reside at the time of the commencement of this action until the present, while his wife and child remained in their residence in Rockland County. The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs, however, was insufficient to rebut the defendants' showing that the injured plaintiff resided in Rockland County at the time of the commencement of the action ( see Morreale v. 105 Page Homeowners Assn., Inc., 64 A.D.3d 689, 884 N.Y.S.2d 93;Ingenito v. Wantagh Racket Sports, Inc., 47 A.D.3d 887, 888, 852 N.Y.S.2d 167). For venue purposes, a residence is a place where a party stays for some time with the bona fide intent to retain the place as a residence for some length of time and with some degree of permanency ( see Ellis v. Wirshba, 18 A.D.3d 805, 796 N.Y.S.2d 388;Furth v. ELRAC, Inc., 11 A.D.3d 509, 510, 784 N.Y.S.2d 112;Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum, 151 A.D.2d 727, 728, 542 N.Y.S.2d 791). The plaintiffs failed to adequately support their assertion that the injured plaintiff maintained a second residence at his parents' home ( see Morreale v. 105 Page Homeowners Assn., Inc., 64 A.D.3d at 690, 884 N.Y.S.2d 93;Doe v. Hall, 36 A.D.3d 651, 651–652, 830 N.Y.S.2d 178;Neu v. St. John's Episcopal Hosp., 27 A.D.3d 538, 539, 811 N.Y.S.2d 433). The affidavits of the plaintiffs and the injured plaintiff's mother were insufficient to overcome the defendants' showing that the injured plaintiff did not reside in Kings County at the time the action was commenced ( see Doe v. Hall, 36 A.D.3d at 652, 830 N.Y.S.2d 178). Furthermore, a letter addressed to the injured plaintiff at his parents' residence, which was dated after the commencement of the action, was insufficient to show that the injured plaintiff resided in Kings County at the time of the commencement of the action ( see Forbes v. Rubinovich, 94 A.D.3d at 810, 943 N.Y.S.2d 120;Labissiere v. Roland, 231 A.D.2d 687, 647 N.Y.S.2d 541).

Accordingly, the defendants' motion to change venue from Kings County to Rockland County should have been granted. RIVERA, J.P., HALL, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gruenwald v. Polatseck

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2014
114 A.D.3d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Gruenwald v. Polatseck

Case Details

Full title:Aron GRUENWALD, et al., respondents, v. Aron POLATSECK, et al., appellants.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 26, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
114 A.D.3d 904
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1293

Citing Cases

Campbell v. New Way Life, Inc.

Here, the referee's finding that the plaintiff resided in Kings County at the time the action was commenced…

Plavnik-Stybel ex rel. Amityville Family Med. Care P. L.L.C. v. Ionescu

Campell v The Western Beef, 123 AD3d 966 [2d Dept 2014]. In Gruemvald v Polatseck, defendants met their prima…