From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gruen v. Krellenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1997
244 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 18, 1997


Counsel for appellant has behaved egregiously. She has demonstrated both disrespect for and a callous disregard for the burden placed upon this Court by filing an appeal that was obviously moot at the time it was filed. Although there was an offer to withdraw the appeal (appeal No. 61184N), that did not occur until some time after the date on which the case was calendared and called, thereby resulting in the wasted expenditure of considerable time and energy not only by her opponent in this litigation but by this Court. The conduct involved called for the imposition of sanctions which we are sua sponte imposing in the amount of $1,000.

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Gruen v. Krellenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1997
244 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Gruen v. Krellenstein

Case Details

Full title:GRUEN v. KRELLENSTEIN

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 111

Citing Cases

Melohn v. Melohn

The appearance was brief and mostly related to the issue of the interim stay. While Supreme Court raised…

Levy v. Carol Management Corporation

The subtenants appealed the grant of attorneys' fees. That aspect of the case was settled just prior to the…