From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gruber v. Gencorelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1992
187 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 16, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

As the condominium by-laws and offering plan mandate that the board of managers is responsible for collections and disbursements for the repair and maintenance of the common areas and further that all actions are to be brought by the board of managers on behalf of the individual unit owners, the plaintiff could have initiated his action against the defendant sponsors through the board of managers (see, Real Property Law art 9-B; Schoninger v Yardarm Beach Homeowners' Assn., 134 A.D.2d 1). However, as the plaintiff was a first-time purchaser, pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement and the offering plan, he was granted the right to proceed directly against the defendant sponsors. We find that the motion of the defendant sponsors to dismiss the complaint for failure to proceed through the board was properly denied. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gruber v. Gencorelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1992
187 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Gruber v. Gencorelli

Case Details

Full title:RONALD GRUBER, Respondent, v. FRANCIS W. GENCORELLI et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
590 N.Y.S.2d 217

Citing Cases

Law Offs. of Thomas F. Liotti v. Dianfend Jiang

CPLR § 3026 Furthermore, in Gruen v. County of Suffolk, 187 AD2d 560, 590 NYS2d 217 (2nd Dept. 1992), the…

ULTIMATE PRECISION METAL PRODS. v. GSM LI LLC

On a motion to dismiss a complaint for legal insufficiency, the issue is whether the complaint gives…