From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grove v. Snyder

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Feb 13, 1918
104 A. 368 (Md. 1918)

Opinion

Decided February 13th, 1918.

Evidence Acts: section 3 of Article 35; purposes of — . Conversations held with the decedents.

The Evidence Acts, section 3 of Article 35 of the Code, were passed in recognition of the necessity of protecting estates, at least to the extent of requiring those asserting claims to produce testimony from disinterested persons, and prohibiting those who are parties to the proceedings to establish their claims by transactions and conversations had with those whose lips are sealed in death.

Decided February 13th, 1918.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County. (HENDERSON, J.)

The cause was argued before BOYD, C.J., BURKE, URNER, STOCKBRIDGE and CONSTABLE, JJ.

Frank G. Wagaman (with whom was A.C. Strite on the brief), for the appellant.

Alexander Armstrong (with whom was J.A. Mason on the brief), for the appellees.


The decree of the lower Court was affirmed, with costs to the appellant, in an opinion by CONSTABLE, J.


Summaries of

Grove v. Snyder

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Feb 13, 1918
104 A. 368 (Md. 1918)
Case details for

Grove v. Snyder

Case Details

Full title:F. DILLON GROVE vs . JACOB J. FUNK AND J.O. SNYDER, ADMINISTRATORS C.T.A…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Feb 13, 1918

Citations

104 A. 368 (Md. 1918)
104 A. 368

Citing Cases

Riley v. Lukens Dredging Contracting Corp.

(Italics supplied.) And in Grove v. Funk, 131 Md. 694 ( 104 A. 368), the Reporter states the ruling of the…