From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grossfield v. Grossfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1996
224 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 20, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated December 12, 1994 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered February 14, 1995, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered February 14, 1995 is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The plaintiff detailed in her complaint and a subsequent affidavit ( see, e.g., Sopesis Constr. v. Solomon, 199 A.D.2d 491; Joel v. Weber, 166 A.D.2d 130) a pattern of cruel conduct toward her by her husband, such that her continued cohabitation with him could reasonably be construed as unsafe or improper because it was potentially harmful to her physical and/or mental health ( see, Domestic Relations Law 170; Brady v. Brady, 64 N.Y.2d 339; cf., Horvath v. Horvath, 177 A.D.2d 617; Zuidema v. Zuidema, 135 A.D.2d 934; Hage v. Hage, 112 A.D.2d 659). Therefore the court properly denied the branch of the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which was to dismiss the complaint.

The court, also properly denied the branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment on his counterclaim. The issue of whether the securities that the husband claims he kept under lock and key were separate or marital property is one of fact for the jury. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grossfield v. Grossfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1996
224 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Grossfield v. Grossfield

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA GROSSFIELD, Respondent, v. SHERWIN GROSSFIELD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 712

Citing Cases

Mullen v. Incorporate Village of Northport

Also, the pleading "is to be afforded a liberal construction (CPLR 3026), and the court should accept as true…

ECKMAN v. UZZI

In addition, the pleading "is to be afforded a liberal construction (CPLR 3026), and the court should accept…