From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grosch v. Grosch

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jan 24, 1995
652 A.2d 1067 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995)

Summary

In Grosch, the trial court found the value of the pension included only the defendant's contributions to the plan, $20,000.

Summary of this case from Grosch v. Grosch

Opinion

(12496)

Argued January 3, 1995

Decision released January 24, 1995

Action for a legal separation, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, where the defendant filed a counterclaim for dissolution of the marriage; thereafter, the plaintiff withdrew her complaint; subsequently, the matter was referred to Hon. John D. Brennan, state trial referee; judgment dissolving the marriage and granting certain other relief, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court; thereafter the court granted the plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees, and the plaintiff filed an amended appeal to this court. Affirmed.

Joseph A. Hourihan, with whom, on the brief, were Joan Keating-McKeon and Robert J. Sickinger, law student intern, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Paul Litman, with whom, on the brief, was Kent Mawhinney, for the appellee (defendant).


Summaries of

Grosch v. Grosch

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jan 24, 1995
652 A.2d 1067 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995)

In Grosch, the trial court found the value of the pension included only the defendant's contributions to the plan, $20,000.

Summary of this case from Grosch v. Grosch
Case details for

Grosch v. Grosch

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA G. GROSCH v. DOUGLAS R. GROSCH

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 24, 1995

Citations

652 A.2d 1067 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995)
36 Conn. App. 946

Citing Cases

Grosch v. Grosch

PER CURIAM. The plaintiff appealed this dissolution matter on three grounds: (1) Did the court improperly…