From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grodensky v. Artichoke Joe’s Casino

Supreme Court of California
Oct 27, 2010
116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 881 (Cal. 2010)

Opinion


Page __

__ Cal.4th __ 240 P.3d 823, 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 881 GRODENSKY (Harvey) v. ARTICHOKE JOE’S CASINO. No. S172237 Supreme Court of California October 27, 2010

         Prior Report: __ Cal.App. __, 91 Cal.Rptr.3d 732.

          OPINION

          Dismissal order filed.

         Review in the above-entitled matter is dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(b)(1).)

         [240 P.3d 824] [116 Cal.Rptr.3d 882] GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

         CORRIGAN, J., was absent and did not participate.


Summaries of

Grodensky v. Artichoke Joe’s Casino

Supreme Court of California
Oct 27, 2010
116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 881 (Cal. 2010)
Case details for

Grodensky v. Artichoke Joe’s Casino

Case Details

Full title:GRODENSKY (Harvey) v. ARTICHOKE JOE’S CASINO.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 27, 2010

Citations

116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 881 (Cal. 2010)
240 P.3d 823

Citing Cases

People v. Torres

Whether section 654 prohibits multiple punishment for active participation in a criminal gang and for the…

James v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

Moreover, the California Supreme Court recently granted review of a case to consider this very issue. Aryeh…