From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimes by and Through Grimes v. Sobol

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 6, 1994
37 F.3d 857 (2d Cir. 1994)

Opinion

No. 434, Docket 93-9096.

Argued September 28, 1994.

Decided October 6, 1994.

Joseph Fleming, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Clement J. Colucci, Asst. Atty. Gen. of the State of N.Y., New York City (G. Oliver Koppell, Atty. Gen. of the State of N.Y., of counsel), for defendants-appellees Thomas Sobol and the New York State Educ. Dept.

Alan G. Krams, New York City (Paul A. Crotty, Corp. Counsel of the City of New York, Kristin M. Helmers, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Joseph Fernandez and New York City Bd. of Educ.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Kimba Wood, Judge.

Before: WINTER, JACOBS, and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.


We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Part 3 of the Discussion section of the district court's opinion. Grimes v. Sobol, 832 F. Supp. 704, 709-713 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).


Summaries of

Grimes by and Through Grimes v. Sobol

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 6, 1994
37 F.3d 857 (2d Cir. 1994)
Case details for

Grimes by and Through Grimes v. Sobol

Case Details

Full title:SANFORD GRIMES, BY AND THROUGH LYNDA GRIMES AND SANFORD GRIMES, HIS NEXT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 6, 1994

Citations

37 F.3d 857 (2d Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Shorter v. St. Cloud State University

SCSU responds that Shorter's problems with SCSU's curriculum cannot form the basis of a Title VI claim. SCSU…

Sandoval v. Hagan

Other courts have reached the same conclusion that § 2000d-7 abrogation applies to regulations enacted…