From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griggs v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 18, 1923
98 So. 490 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)

Opinion

5 Div. 884.

December 18, 1923.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Russell County; J.S. Williams, Judge.

Columbus Griggs was convicted of Vagrancy, and appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Frank M. De Graffenried, of Seale, for appellant.

Every act of vagrancy must he shown to have occurred within twelve months preceding the indictment. Code 1907, §§ 7347, 7883, 7844.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction should have been raised by request for the affirmative charge or motion for a new trial. Warren v. State, 18 Ala. App. 245, 90 So. 277.


On the trial the court, over the objection and exception of defendant, admitted evidence of facts tending to show vagrancy of defendant prior to the time covered by the indictment. This was error. The crime of vagrancy denounced by the statute, being a misdemeanor, is barred by the limitation of one year, and acts tending to prove that defendant might have been convicted of vagrancy before that time are not admissible to prove that he was guilty within the period covered by the indictment. For the errors of the court in admitting this character of evidence, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reserved and remanded.


Summaries of

Griggs v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 18, 1923
98 So. 490 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)
Case details for

Griggs v. State

Case Details

Full title:GRIGGS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Dec 18, 1923

Citations

98 So. 490 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)
98 So. 490

Citing Cases

Gargis v. State

Nailer v. State, 18 Ala. App. 127, 90 So. 131. The question of voidability of the affidavit was raised by…

Fiorella v. State

3. The charge against defendant was a misdemeanor, every act of which must be shown to have occurred within…