From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. Fla. Parole Probation Com'n

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 1984
451 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1984)

Opinion

Nos. 62067, 62068.

April 19, 1984. Rehearing Denied July 12, 1984.

Petition from the First District Court of Appeal.

Jack A. Griffith, in pro. per.

Bobby Wright, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Chief Judge, First Dist. Court of Appeal, Tallahassee, for respondent.


Prisoners, seeking judicial review of final action of respondent Florida Parole and Probation Commission in setting allegedly improper presumptive parole release dates, have filed with this Court petitions for writ of mandamus directing the First District Court of Appeal to entertain their appeals pursuant to Daniels v. Florida Parole Probation Commission, 401 So.2d 1351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), approved, Roberson v. Florida Parole Probation Commission, 444 So.2d 917 (Fla. 1983). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(8), Fla. Const.

Documents filed with the petitions show that both appeals were filed with the district court on June 10, 1981, twenty-nine days after Daniels was filed and within the thirty-day grace period set forth in Daniels. In Jordan v. Florida Parole Probation Commission, 403 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), the district court made clear that the Daniels grace period made judicial review available to prisoners with a pre- Daniels final order from the Commission. Id. at 592.

After the Jordan decision issued, petitioners and two other prisoners who had also sought belated appeal from final Commission action within the thirty-day grace period, sought to reinstate their appeals or, in the alternative, to file petitions for writ of mandamus. Though procedurally indistinguishable, petitioners' motions were denied, the other two prisoners' motions were granted.

In light of the delineation of jurisdiction in Daniels and Jordan and in light of the district court's granting review to other petitioners similarly situated, the denial of jurisdiction appears to be error. We do not choose to issue the writ of mandamus at this time, however. Rather, we remand these notices of belated appeal and motions to reinstate appeal or alternate leave to file petition for writ of mandamus for reconsideration by the district court.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, McDONALD and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Griffith v. Fla. Parole Probation Com'n

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 1984
451 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1984)
Case details for

Griffith v. Fla. Parole Probation Com'n

Case Details

Full title:JACK A. GRIFFITH, PETITIONER, v. FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION COMM'N…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 12, 1984

Citations

451 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1984)

Citing Cases

Griffith v. Florida Parole Probation Com'n

Jordan, 403 So.2d at 592. The First District dismissed the appeal. Griffith v. Florida Parole and Probation…