From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1984
99 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

February 2, 1984


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Amann, Jr., J.), entered on November 4, 1982, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $750,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ross, Carro, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Griffith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1984
99 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Griffith v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:LESTER GRIFFITH, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Koerner v. Club Mediterranee, S.A.

A New York district court sitting in diversity may look to other jury awards condoned or remitted by the…

In re Joint E. So. Dist. Asbestos Lit.

ial conscience," see Earl v. Bouchard Transp. Co., 917 F.2d 1320, 1327 (2d Cir. 1990); Ismail v. Cohen, 899…