From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. California

U.S.
Dec 5, 1960
364 U.S. 476 (1960)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.

No. 457.

Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 179 Cal.App.2d 558, 4 Cal.Rptr. 531.

J. B. Tietz for appellant.

Robert E. Reed and R. B. Pegram for the State of California, and Roger Arneberg and Bourke Jones for the City of Los Angeles, appellees.


The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


Summaries of

Griffith v. California

U.S.
Dec 5, 1960
364 U.S. 476 (1960)
Case details for

Griffith v. California

Case Details

Full title:GRIFFITH v . CALIFORNIA ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 5, 1960

Citations

364 U.S. 476 (1960)

Citing Cases

State, by Mondale v. Independent School Dist. No. 31

There is no Minnesota decision directly in point, but we believe the law to be correctly enunciated by those…

People ex rel. Younger v. County of El Dorado

) (Italics added.) Similarly, it has been held that section 13 does not forbid delegation of the power to tax…