From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. Bergstol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1965
23 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

March 22, 1965


In an action pursuant to statute (Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, art. 15), to remove a cloud on the title of certain real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered July 17, 1964, which granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, struck out the defendant's answer, and directed that a certain memorandum agreement for the sale of real property, recorded in the County Clerk's office, be vacated and cancelled of record. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. On this record, we find that the memorandum was not recordable under section 294 Real Prop. of the Real Property Law, because: (a) it was not acknowledged by the parties, and (b) the signature and acknowledgment of the alleged subscribing witness were defective, erroneous and not in compliance with statute and case law (see Real Property Law, §§ 292, 294; Matter of Keppler v. Nessler, 225 App. Div. 99; Matter of Shaw, 82 N.Y.S.2d 298; Hollenback v. Fleming, 6 Hill 303; Earley v. St. Patrick's Church Soc., 81 Hun 369; Pritchard v. Palmer, 88 Hun 412; cf. People ex rel. Long Is. R.R. Co. v. Board of R.R. Comrs., 75 App. Div. 106; People ex rel. Erie R.R. Co. v. Board of R.R. Comrs., 105 App. Div. 273). We have not reached or decided any other question. Beldock, P.J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Griffith v. Bergstol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1965
23 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Griffith v. Bergstol

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT I. GRIFFITH, Respondent, v. LEIF BERGSTOL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 22, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Rosendale v. Mr. Cooper Grp.

Plaintiffs have successfully sued for invalidation of defective mortgages where they have proven “a…

Plotch v. Wells Fargo Bank

However, the cases on which plaintiff relies concern a fundamental defect with the underlying record. See,…