From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffis v. J.C. Penny Company, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 17, 1976
333 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Summary

In Griffis v. J.C. Penny Company, Inc., 333 So.2d 503 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), a defective pot was sold in December 1972, and caused an injury one year later.

Summary of this case from Peabody Intern. Corp. v. Wylain, Inc.

Opinion

No. BB-456.

June 17, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Thomas J. Shave, Jr., J.

Rudy Hernandez, of Hernandez Matthews, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Ronald L. Palmer and Charles Cook Howell, III, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D'Auito Dean, Jacksonville, for appellees.


The question raised by this interlocutory appeal is whether the plaintiffs must obtain service of process on the nonresident corporate defendant under the provisions of Section 48.182, Florida Statutes, or Section 48.193, Florida Statutes.

The plaintiffs allege that the defendant negligently manufactured a fondue pot which it distributed to J.C. Penny Company, Inc., where it was purchased in December of 1972 and given to plaintiffs as a gift. In December of 1973, the minor plaintiff was injured when the pot handle snapped causing hot oil to spill on him. Upon motions of defendant, the trial court dismissed plaintiffs' amended complaint and quashed the service of process on it. After filing a second amended complaint, plaintiffs moved the court to clarify its order by ruling whether they should serve process on the defendant under Section 48.182, Florida Statutes, or Section 48.193, Florida Statutes. The court ruled that on authority of AB CTC v. Morejon, 324 So.2d 625 (Fla. 1975), service of process would be governed by Section 48.182, Florida Statutes. This interlocutory appeal followed.

Section 48.182, Florida Statutes, became effective 1 July 1970, and Section 48.193, Florida Statutes, became effective 1 July 1973. Neither statute can be applied retroactively to allow service as to an alleged wrongful act or act or omission committed before enactment of the statutes. AB CTC v. Morejon, supra.

The alleged negligent acts of the defendant took place before December 1972, because it was then that Penny sold the allegedly defective pot to someone who gave it to plaintiffs.

Since the alleged negligent acts of the defendant took place before the effective date of Section 48.193, Florida Statutes, but after the effective date of Section 48.182, Florida Statutes, the trial court correctly ruled that Section 48.182, Florida Statutes, was applicable to this case.

This interlocutory appeal is dismissed.

BOYER, C.J., and McCORD, J., concur.


Summaries of

Griffis v. J.C. Penny Company, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 17, 1976
333 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

In Griffis v. J.C. Penny Company, Inc., 333 So.2d 503 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), a defective pot was sold in December 1972, and caused an injury one year later.

Summary of this case from Peabody Intern. Corp. v. Wylain, Inc.
Case details for

Griffis v. J.C. Penny Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ERIK JAMES GRIFFIS, A MINOR, BY HIS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS, ET AL.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 17, 1976

Citations

333 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Peabody Intern. Corp. v. Wylain, Inc.

Wylain argues that despite the fact that the sale of the valve occurred before 1973, the statute applies…

American Motors Corp. v. Abrahantes

While section 4, chapter 84-2, may indicate a legislative intent that the amendments be applied…