From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grice v. Baltimore County

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 3, 2009
354 F. App'x 742 (4th Cir. 2009)

Summary

placing employee on paid suspension not materially adverse because retaining salary and benefits prevented "serious hardship"

Summary of this case from Heggins v. City of High Point

Opinion

No. 09-1047.

Argued: October 28, 2009.

Decided: December 3, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01701-JFM).

ARGUED: Kathleen Mary Cahill, Law Offices of Kathleen Cahill, Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Jeffrey Grant Cook, Baltimore County Office of Law, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: John E. Beverungen, County Attorney, Baltimore County Office of Law, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Summaries of

Grice v. Baltimore County

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 3, 2009
354 F. App'x 742 (4th Cir. 2009)

placing employee on paid suspension not materially adverse because retaining salary and benefits prevented "serious hardship"

Summary of this case from Heggins v. City of High Point
Case details for

Grice v. Baltimore County

Case Details

Full title:Miriam GRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND; Fred…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 3, 2009

Citations

354 F. App'x 742 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Wood v. Klamath Publishing, Inc.

While courts must be cautious to not apply rules applicable under one statute to another because of…

Weintraub v. Mental Health Authority of St. Mary's, Inc.

"[W]hen an employer articulates a reason for discharging the plaintiff not forbidden by law, it is not our…