From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greengard v. Odorono Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

April, 1932.


Judgments reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiffs made out a prima facie case for submission to the jury. The evidence of the chemist, Dr. Pozen, concerning the result of the application of certain chemicals in a solution to the human skin was admissible and was improperly excluded. ( Scott v. State, 141 Ala. 1; Citizens' Gas Light Co. v. O'Brien, 118 Ill. 174; Wigm. Ev. [2d ed.] §§ 555, 556, 560.) Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Greengard v. Odorono Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Greengard v. Odorono Company

Case Details

Full title:JULIUS E. GREENGARD, Appellant, v. THE ODORONO COMPANY, Respondent. LEONA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Brei

" 9 N.Y.2d at 497, 215 N.Y.S.2d at 54, 174 N.E.2d at 732. And see Greengard v. Odorono Co., 235 App. Div.…