From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greene v. Kelsey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 2, 2006
1:06-CV-00003-REC-SMS-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2006)

Opinion

1:06-CV-00003-REC-SMS-P.

March 2, 2006


ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in "(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

In this case, none of the defendants reside in this district. The claim arose in Los Angeles County, which is in the Central District of California. Therefore, plaintiff's claim should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a);Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Greene v. Kelsey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 2, 2006
1:06-CV-00003-REC-SMS-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Greene v. Kelsey

Case Details

Full title:CEDRIC GREENE, Plaintiff, v. D.M. KELSEY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 2, 2006

Citations

1:06-CV-00003-REC-SMS-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2006)

Citing Cases

In re Means

And in the case of Samuel Parker it was said in a concurring opinion that in this country the disposition of…

In re Jones

Ashby v. Page, 106 N.C. 328; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 67 N.C. 307. True, we have held, and the ruling is in…